Barc's Corner

The word "blog" sounds like a horror movie. AHHH! The Blog!

Barc's Corner

Blog Post # 9 – Evaluation

April 6th, 2010 · No Comments · Uncategorized

Continuous monitoring of student progress per each step of the process (5, 8, 11, 15) will allow me to assess student thought processes.  Rather than have students peer-review in person, this method is more effective.   I can now see the details and reasons why they’ve selected particular sites and students have the opportunity to review their classmates discussions/peer-reviews.  For struggling students, this is important because they now a have a permanent record of discussions taking place that they can reference during the 4-5 days of the WebQuest seminar.

Students will be evaluated based upon the following rubric:

Rubric:

Excellent (A): Replies to 6 other classmates’ websites using the correct Netiquette format for all responses.  Responses are insightful.

Good (B): Replies to 6 other classmates’ websites using the correct Netiquette format for most responses.  Responses are good.

Average (C): 1 or 2 responses missing OR Replies to 6 other classmates’ websites using the correct Netiquette format.  Responses are somewhat good.  Uses proper Netiquette format for some responses (i.e. 2-3), but not the rest.

Poor (D/F): 1 or 2 responses missing.  Responses are irrelevant or poor.  Uses incorrect Netiquette format throughout responses.

Tags:

Blog Post # 8 – Implementation

April 6th, 2010 · No Comments · Uncategorized

The wiki will be introduced to my students once we begin the WebQuest seminar.   I would like to use the library at my school so that students can register for a wikispaces account.  I would also introduce the ‘wikispaces’ job aid to students and conduct a ‘run-through’ of wikispaces accompanied with the objectives of the Lesson Learned? WebQuest.  One class period would suffice because I could work out any problems or issues that students face with the site.  The only way I foresee protecting the wiki pages is to only allow registered users to edit the wiki.

One risk is that students from one class period may lift links from another class period, and therefore, it defeats the purpose of students working independently to discover information on their own.  However, I think this would occur otherwise regardless of using wikispaces, so I don’t think it represents as big an issue as I thought earlier.

In order to get permission to use wikispaces, I would inform my department chair, assistant principal, and the tech. coordinator at my District Office.  They seem to be pretty lenient about using social networking sites, except for Youtube, Facebook, and Twitter.  I’ve tested wikispaces at my school and it’s not blocked.  I don’t foresee an issue with using it.

Tags:

Blog Post # 7: Development

April 5th, 2010 · No Comments · Uncategorized

Students will be using the process link on the Lesson Learned? WebQuest site along with the Website Credibility Evaluation Organizer to help them judge each other’s sites (e.g. what makes a valid website?, etc.).

Updating the student peer-review lists may be the most daunting task because I would randomize it and make sure different students are peer-reviewing per period.  Not sure if there is any good randomization software available?

I needed to have a separate site per class because I want to make it easy to grade and also minimize students from lifting their peers’ website links in the other periods.   I’m not sure if there is a way to black out the url for each wikispace or block students from going to other periods, e.g. through a password feature.  This is the aspect that troubles me the most.  Any ideas would definitely be appreciated.

Tags:

Blog Post # 6: Design

April 5th, 2010 · No Comments · Uncategorized

First, I used http://www.wikispaces.com to design a wiki-hub for students to peer-review the links that they’ve selected for the Lesson Learned? WebQuest.

Second, each of the links below corresponds to a specific class period.  The idea was for students to learn from one another and give me the ability to monitor student discussions, progress, transfer of knowledge between steps,  etc. in completing each of the tasks.  I decided to use a wiki because I wanted students to interact and constructively criticize each other.  By learning from classmates, students can navigate more easily toward the end goal which is discovering ‘truth’ with limited or no bias.

http://llwikip1.wikispaces.com/

http://llwikip3.wikispaces.com/

http://llwikip5.wikispaces.com/

http://llwikip6.wikispaces.com/

Third, I wrote clear directions in the form of enabling objectives so that students would know their expectations.

Fourth, I provided non-examples and examples so that students would know what success looks like.

Fifth, I provided a rubric to help students measure success and what my expectations were.

Sixth, I provided a peer-review chart per each step (3, 8, 11, 15) to structure the discussions that take place on the wiki-hub since students will be posting on a recurring basis.

Tags:

Blog Post # 5: Analysis

April 5th, 2010 · No Comments · Uncategorized

I wanted to design a way for students to peer review/evaluate each others’ websites for an instructional package I designed in EDTEC 544/572.  In brainstorming ideas for setting up the wiki for my students to peer-review website links, I realized that I was dealing with a hierarchical, task analysis.  Students would need to complete one step in order to advance to the next.  For example, before comprehending the ‘responses to the Great Depression’, students must know the ’causes of the Great Depression’.  In effect, I used a constructivist approach because I wanted students to discover and negotiate meaning on their own (ala David Jonassen).   Prior to completing each peer-review, students would need to locate websites using the Website Credibility Evaluation Organizer.   Upon conducting the peer review, students would follow the examples/non-examples provided on the wiki-hub to know how to comment about their classmates websites.   The downside to using a wiki is that I can provide a password for students to access the wiki, but this does not eliminate student discussion or sharing of websites outside of class.  My goal is for students to research websites independently, but the wiki could be an impediment.  Overall, however, I believe students would share sites regardless of the use of a wiki.  Therefore, fostering a discussion about what makes a site credible is more important so that struggling students can learn from their classmates.

Many English teachers at my school usually conduct peer-reviews with other assignments within the classroom, however, the problem that I’ve encountered with this option is that some students do not complete the assignment, other students finish early, and as a result a number of students are off-task.  This type of peer-review is helpful, but I think using a wiki can be more effective because it provides a structure that allows me to easily assess students by seeing their thought processes based on their posts.  It also helps struggling students reference their peers ideas in a non-threatening or pressure-like environment–they can do it on their own at home.

Barriers:

skills/knowledge – this could be resolved by demonstrating to students how to use the wiki or by providing a job aid.

motivation – some students may not want to submit their links, but learning ideas from others may have a positive influence on their attitude towards the assignment.

environment – some students may claim that they do not have internet access.  This excuse doesn’t work with me.  I tell them that they have the option of the public library and the school library.

Tags:

Blog Post # 4 – Idea for Wiki

March 20th, 2010 · No Comments · Uncategorized

Global Financial Crisis 2008 Project Wiki-Hub

The idea I have in mind for a wiki is an addendum to a job aid (project for EDTEC 544/572) for my Lesson Learned? Webquest.  Note: this was my ‘content map’ and eventually ‘design document’ that I used for 544.  Reference the link below and download the “process.pdf” or “process.doc”.  Both are the same document.

http://globalfinancialcrisis08.weebly.com/process-student.html

Once you’ve downloaded the job aid, open it.  Notice how students would be using ‘Microsoft Word’ for almost every procedure to post the potential links they are researching (and then just saving the document and reopening a new one as the process continues).  Since creating this job aid, I thought this was a dull feature of the project.  I’ve never implemented this particular Webquest, but I can sense that students will most likely not interact with each other and I would be forced to help students in a one on one more often than I would like.   As I was brainstorming ideas for a wiki, I thought about making my Lesson Learned? Webquest more asynchronously-focused, whereby students would debate, question, doubt, disagree, agree, support, discover the websites that they find online while conducting research for the project.  Using the Website Evaluation Criteria Organizer and the Wiki-Hub, students can conduct peer-reviews by sharing their thoughts about the websites that they find.  This potentially could save me time as a teacher by lessening the amount of students inquiring “Is this correct? Am I on the right track with my websites? Are these websites good? How do I know which one is better than the other?”  Instead of taking a class period to review student websites, we can review as a class what discussions are taking place on the wiki.  Now, I can require students to post their own ranked websites and interact with their classmates on the wiki by posting comments about agreements or disagreements.  Instead of students learning from me, they’ll be learning from each other. Once they conduct discussions about their ranked sites, they can revise their website lists so that they

Terminal Objective:

NOTE: Peer-Reviews assignments would take place after Step 3, Step 8, Step 11, & Step 15.  This could be an in-class activity with a substitute or assigned as homework.

Students will be able to evaluate 2 other students links/URLs that they have ranked by using the criteria on the Website Evaluation Criteria Organizer and the Global Financial Crisis 2008 Project Wiki-Hub.

Enabling Objectives:

1)  Post links/URLs to 6 websites that you have ranked along with a 1-2 sentence explanation for each website that you select.  DO NOT just provide a simple description of the website.  Make sure you address how your websites follow the criteria checklist found in the Website Evaluation Criteria Organizer.

2)  Post a 4-5 sentence comment on 6 other classmates’ websites using the Peer Review chart/list. (I would create a rotating Peer Review chart/list of student names beforehand (rotating = students will not peer review the same student each time).  I will make sure that each student receives equal numbers of responses throughout the Webquest process so that students do not get left out of the peer review process.  From your assigned classmates’ links, select 3 good/excellent websites and 3 average/poor websites.  Your goal is twofold:

a) enrich your learning by interacting with your classmates about what they have discovered and what new ideas you might potentially discover for your project,

b) use the Wiki-Hub as a forum to constructively criticize your classmates.  This means using proper Netiquette when responding to your classmates posts. References the examples and non-examples of improper and proper Netiquette provided below:

Non-example “Good website!” Thumbs Up!”
Non-example “This website sucks! BOOOO! Btw, you’re ugly! LOL!”
Example “I doubt the validity of this website because the author is not credible(reliable, trustworthy); he lacks the proper credentials (Ph.d., doctorate)  to argue the claims that he is making”
Example “The author of this website is biased (too one-sided, not neutral).  The website lacks any real information that is useful or relevant in addressing the topic we are investigating. In addition, the author provides no evidence to support his claims.”
Example “This is an excellent website.  I discovered a lot of useful information for my own project.  The author is credible because she has credentials, she’s  unbiased, and she  provides proper MLA or APA citations for her sources”

Risks:

Students from another one of my U.S. History classes may potentially gain access to the Wiki-Hub from another classmates’ period.  I fear that instead of discovering websites independently, they might just rely on copying their friends’ website links.  If I create one wiki per class, and close the wiki to only registered students, this might help resolve this issue, but I don’t think I can completely counteract students from hijacking their classmates’ ideas.  I guess this is the job of a careful, sophisticated nosey teacher—someone I am striving to become in the future.

Rubric:

Excellent (A): Replies to 6 other classmates’ websites using the correct Netiquette format for all responses.  Responses are insightful.

Good (B): Replies to 6 other classmates’ websites using the correct Netiquette format for most responses.  Responses are good.

Average (C): 1 or 2 responses missing OR Replies to 6 other classmates’ websites using the correct Netiquette format.  Responses are somewhat good.  Uses proper Netiquette format for some responses (i.e. 2-3), but not the rest.

Poor (D/F): 1 or 2 responses missing.  Responses are irrelevant or poor.  Uses incorrect Netiquette format throughout responses.

Tags:

Blog lesson (Blog Post # 3)

March 14th, 2010 · No Comments · Uncategorized

Timetoast Timeline (REVISED)

http://www.timetoast.com

If I were to construct a blog, then it would have to be something creative and original–something to capture student attention.  TimeToast looks like a great alternative to paper timelines.  This might be an interesting way to go paperless, stay green, and encourage discussion amongst students about causes and effects of events, e.g. The Civil War, Civil Rights Movement.  I thought that this would be a fabulous lesson for students.  Ideally, if I could reserve a tech lab on the day of a sub or just have the sub work with students to use the SmartBoard it might work.  It would have be to have a preset timeline in place and have students explain online how events are connected to one another in an analytical fashion, e.g. historical events of the Civil Rights Movement.  Based on what I learned in my post about discussions, I would have students in groups of 3, but give students roles to address on the timeline.  I would have a list of director, lead writer, and editor. Students’ names would automatically be assigned and attached to a role at the beginning of the class period, descriptions of roles to hold students accountable individually, and a series of questions to guide thinking while they are completing their individual task.  The only problem that I have with the site is that it doesn’t have all of the features of my paper timeline. My paper timeline requires students to draw arrows from one event to another by explaining relationships between events.  I could probably resolve this through the comments feature on the blog, in which students identify the two events that they are drawing a relationship between and then explain how they are interrelated.

Risks:

1) Trying to hold individuals accountable. If a student decides they do not want to work, I would remove them from the group and tell them they must complete the assignment on their own. I would tell the students in that particular group that they must take on a dual role since they are one group member short.

2) I’ve never done this activity before, so I don’t have online good examples or non-examples to share with students, however, I could show them sample paper timelines that I’ve stored over the years.

Terminal objective: Students post 1 explanation for each of the 15/20 ideas on a preset Civil Rights Movement timeline on www.timetoast.com by the end of the period. Students also reply to 5 explanations from their classmates either disagreeing or agreeing with their classmate’s explanation and explaining why by the end of the period.

Roles:

Director: Makes sure all aspects of the timeline are completed on time. Solicits ideas from all group members for all parts of the timeline. Leads group in deciding what connections/linkages their group will make. Works with the lead writer and editor to construct coherent explanations. Your group must identify the two events that they are drawing a relationship between and then explain how they are interrelated.

Lead Writer: Helps Director decide which ideas they want to 1) identify, 2) explain 3) link. Leads the group in creating explanations. Writes the explanations.

Editor: Corrects grammatical errors/mechanics/sentence structure problems. Works with lead writer to construct coherent answers based on this role.

Rubric:

Excellent (A): Insightful and correct. Student posts 1 explanation for all 15/20 ideas and why they made a connection/linkage between the two ideas on the timeline (Remember: You must identify the two ideas you are linking between. Student does not copy/repeat/plagiarize classmates’ answers for any of their posts.

Good (B): Correct. Student posts 1 explanation for 12-13/20 ideas and why they made a connection/linkage between the two ideas on the timeline (Remember: You must identify the two ideas you are linking between. Student does not copy/repeat/plagiarize classmates’ answers for any of their posts.

Average (C): Somewhat correct. Student posts 1 explanation for 10-11/20 ideas and why they made a connection/linkage between the two ideas on the timeline (Remember: You must identify the two ideas you are linking between. Student copies/repeats/plagiarizes classmates’ answers for some of their posts.

Poor (D/F): Completely incorrect or not understandable. Student posts 1 explanation for less than 10/20 ideas and why they made a connection/linkage between the two ideas on the timeline (Remember: You must identify the two ideas you are linking between. Student copies/repeats/plagiarizes classmates’ answers for almost all of their posts.

If I were to construct a blog, then it would have to be something creative and original–something to capture student attention.  TimeToast looks like a great alternative to paper timelines.  This might be an interesting way to go paperless, stay green, and encourage discussion amongst students about causes and effects of events, e.g. The Civil War, Civil Rights Movement.  I thought that this would be a fabulous lesson for students.  Ideally, if I could reserve a tech lab on the day of a sub or just have the sub work with students to use the SmartBoard it might work.  It would have be to have a preset timeline in place and have students explain online how events are connected to one another in an analytical fashion, e.g. historical events of the Civil Rights Movement.  Based on what I learned in my post about discussions, I would have students in groups of 3, but give students roles to address on the timeline.  I would have a list of director, lead writer, and editor.   Students’ names would automatically be assigned and attached to a role at the beginning of the class period, descriptions of roles to hold students accountable individually, and a series of questions to guide thinking while they are completing their individual task.  The only problem that I have with the site is that it doesn’t have all of the features of my paper timeline.  My paper timeline requires students to draw arrows from one event to another by explaining relationships between events.  I could probably resolve this through the comments feature on the blog, in which students identify the two events that they are drawing a relationship between and then explain how they are interrelated.
Risks:
1) Trying to hold individuals accountable.  If a student decides they do not want to work, I would remove them from the group and tell them they must complete the assignment on their own.  I would tell the students in that particular group that they must take on a dual role since they are one group member short.
2)  I’ve never done this activity before, so I don’t have online good examples or non-examples to share with students, however, I could show them sample paper timelines that I’ve stored over the years.
Terminal objective: Students post 1 explanation for each of the 15/20 ideas on a preset Civil Rights Movement timeline on  www.timetoast.com by the end of the period.  Students also reply to 5 explanations from their classmates either disagreeing or agreeing with their classmate’s explanation and explaining why by the end of the period.
Roles:
Director:  Makes sure all aspects of the timeline are completed on time.  Solicits ideas from all group members for all parts of the timeline.  Leads group in deciding what connections/linkages their group will make.  Works with the lead writer and editor to construct coherent explanations.  Your group must identify the two events that they are drawing a relationship between and then explain how they are interrelated.
Lead Writer:   Helps Director decide which ideas they want to 1) identify, 2) explain 3) link.    Leads the group in creating explanations. Writes the explanations.
Editor: Corrects grammatical errors/mechanics/sentence structure problems.  Works with lead writer to construct coherent answers based on this role.
Rubric:
Excellent (A):  Insightful and correct.  Student posts 1 explanation for all 15/20 ideas and why they made a connection/linkage between the two ideas on the timeline (Remember: You must identify the two ideas you are linking between.    Student does not copy/repeat/plagiarize classmates’ answers for any of their posts.
Good (B):  Correct.  Student posts 1 explanation for 12-13/20 ideas and why they made a connection/linkage between the two ideas on the timeline (Remember: You must identify the two ideas you are linking between.    Student does not copy/repeat/plagiarize classmates’ answers for any of their posts.
Average (C):  Somewhat correct.  Student posts 1 explanation for 10-11/20 ideas and why they made a connection/linkage between the two ideas on the timeline (Remember: You must identify the two ideas you are linking between.    Student copies/repeats/plagiarizes classmates’ answers for some of their posts.
Poor (D/F):  Completely incorrect or not understandable.  Student posts 1 explanation for less than 10/20 ideas and why they made a connection/linkage between the two ideas on the timeline (Remember: You must identify the two ideas you are linking between.  Student copies/repeats/plagiarizes classmates’ answers for almost all of their posts.

http://www.timetoast.com/

Tags:

Educational Blogs (Post # 2)

March 14th, 2010 · No Comments · Uncategorized

1) http://steve-wheeler.blogspot.com/

2) http://deangroom.wordpress.com/2010/03/10/why-arent-they-doing-anything/

3) http://theedublogger.com/2010/02/22/guest-post-by-kathleen-mcgeady-teaching-commenting-skills/#comments

4) http://www.teacherslovesmartboards.com/

5) http://educationaltechnology.ca/couros/483?cp=all

Steve Wheeler’s “Learning with E’s”

Ref: “Lurking and Loafing” 3/10/10

I enjoyed the discussion about the differences between “lurking” and “loafing” in asynchrounous and synchronous discussions. I learned about the theories that explain why students choose to disengage themselves from participation (fear of criticism in a large group, waiting to hear what others have to say) and how some students just copy what others say so it is difficult for tutors or teachers to disseminate who receives credit for a blog post. I also learned about the solutions, based on Harkins and Petty’s research studies, to resolve these problems, e.g. smaller group settings, increasing the difficulty level of tasks to make it more challenging, differentiate or assign roles within tasks to hold individuals accountable. Reading the discussions helped differentiate what “lurking” and “loafing” meant. This topic really reminded me of my group’s experience in our 690 Research Project where we had students repeating the same things students already said. Now that I read this, I can see that the large classroom setting may have contributed to certain students ‘lurking’ out of fear of criticism or just listening before they respond.

Edublogger

Ref: Teaching Commenting Skills 2/22/10

There’s an interesting discussion about what type of formats should be used when blogging. It seems like there was disagreement and later consensus about using a structured format (e.g.”letter” style) for younger students (e.g 7 yrs old) vs. a more casual format. The post also included discussions about

proper netiquette.

Teachers Love SmartBoards

Ref: http://www.teacherslovesmartboards.com/

I didn’t find too many discussions on this site, but many posts geared toward elementary and middle school teachers about possible uses of websites with SMARTBoard tools that can be used in the classroom. As a high school teacher with a SMARTBoard, I find this sad because my school is investing loads of money on this technology, but many teachers think PowerPoint is the only thing that can be used on a SMARTBoard. The problem is that I find it’s not student centered enough unless they are doing the presenting. Also, I’m annoyed how there seems to be little in terms of free resources available for high school teachers, e.g. standards aligned games, etc.

Ref: http://educationaltechnology.ca/couros/483

I-Pods in a Classroom: My Observation 11/30/05

Fascinating discussions between students and adults about why I-Pods with earbuds should be aloud in classroom settings. Most students argued that it helped them focus and not become prone to distractions from students, esp those with ADD or ADHD (i’m not sure how true this is or what studies show). A lot of controversy about what students might be listening to and how focused they really might be to what teachers are saying. As a U.S. History teacher, I thought I would see more about how I-Pods could be integrated into lessons by teachers such as using music and lyrics to teach history.If I create an activity revolving around music and lyrics, students will be forced to (and want to in many cases) listen to the songs I provide them to get historical context for the songs.

Likes/Dislikes

I hated how many of the sites had random discussions, fonts that were too bright or just too much going on in the site. When I see that a blog is not simple or easy on the eyes, I immediately hit the “Previous Page” button on my browser. I won’t be subscribing to many of the blogs just because I have tons of readings from books that I’ve wanted to read for a very long time. Common Craft might be the only one I pay attention to because I plan on using the idea for future lessons in US History and AP Government. Also, since I just receieved a SMARTBOARD in my classroom this year, I might subscribe to

the Teachers Love SmartBoards blog. COMET has taken a lot ofpersonal reading time away from me, so I don’t feel like I have enough time to read both books and blogs.) http://steve-wheeler.blogspot.com/
2) http://deangroom.wordpress.com/2010/03/10/why-arent-they-doing-anything/
3) http://theedublogger.com/2010/02/22/guest-post-by-kathleen-mcgeady-teaching-commenting-skills/#comments
4) http://www.teacherslovesmartboards.com/
5) http://educationaltechnology.ca/couros/483?cp=all
Steve Wheeler’s “Learning with E’s”
Ref: “Lurking and Loafing” 3/10/10
I enjoyed the discussion about the differences between “lurking” and “loafing” in
asynchrounous and synchronous discussions. I learned about the theories that explain
why students choose to disengage themselves from participation (fear of criticism in a
large group, waiting to hear what others have to say) and how some students just copy
what others say so it is difficult for tutors or teachers to disseminate who
receives credit for a blog post.  I also learned about the solutions, based
on Harkins and Petty’s research studies, to resolve these problems, e.g. smaller group settings,
increasing the difficulty level of tasks to make it more challenging, differentiate or assign
roles within tasks to hold individuals accountable.  Reading the discussions helped differentiate
what “lurking” and “loafing” meant. This topic really reminded me of my group’s experience in our
690 Research Project where we had students repeating the same things students already said.  Now
that I read this, I can see that the large classroom setting may have contributed to certain
students ‘lurking’ out of fear of criticism or just listening before they respond.
Edublogger
Ref: Teaching Commenting Skills 2/22/10
There’s an interesting discussion about what type of formats should be used when blogging.  It seems
like there was disagreement and later consensus about using a structured format (e.g.”letter” style)
for younger students (e.g 7 yrs old) vs. a more casual format.  The post also included discussions about
proper netiquette.
Teachers Love SmartBoards
Ref: http://www.teacherslovesmartboards.com/
I didn’t find too many discussions on this site, but many posts geared toward elementary and middle
school teachers about possible uses of websites with SMARTBoard tools that can be used in the classroom.
As a high school teacher with a SMARTBoard, I find this sad because my school is investing loads of money
on this technology, but many teachers think PowerPoint is the only thing that can be used on a SMARTBoard.
The problem is that I find it’s not student centered enough unless they are doing the presenting.  Also,
I’m annoyed how there seems to be little in terms of free resources available for high school teachers, e.g.
standards aligned games, etc.
Ref: http://educationaltechnology.ca/couros/483
I-Pods in a Classroom: My Observation 11/30/05
Fascinating discussions between students and adults about why I-Pods with earbuds should be aloud in classroom
settings.  Most students argued that it helped them focus and not become prone to distractions from students, esp
those with ADD or ADHD (i’m not sure how true this is or what studies show).  A lot of controversy about what
students might be listening to and how focused they really might be to what teachers are saying.  As a U.S. History teacher,
I thought I would see more about how I-Pods could be integrated into lessons by teachers such as using music and lyrics to teach history.
If I create an activity revolving around music and lyrics, students will be forced to (and want to in many cases) listen to the
songs I provide them to get historical context for the songs.
I hated how many of the sites had random discussions, fonts that were too bright or just too much
going on in the site.  When I see that a blog is not simple or easy on the eyes, I immediately hit
the “Previous Page” button on my browser.  I won’t be subscribing to many of the blogs just because I have
tons of readings from books that I’ve wanted to read for a very long time. Common Craft might be
the only one I pay attention to because I plan on using the idea for future lessons in US History and
AP Government.  Also, since I just receieved a SMARTBOARD in my classroom this year, I might subscribe to
the Teachers Love SmartBoards blog.  COMET has taken a lot ofpersonal reading time away from me, so I don’t feel like I
have enough time to read both books and blogs1) http://steve-wheeler.blogspot.com/
2) http://deangroom.wordpress.com/2010/03/10/why-arent-they-doing-anything/
3) http://theedublogger.com/2010/02/22/guest-post-by-kathleen-mcgeady-teaching-commenting-skills/#comments
4) http://www.teacherslovesmartboards.com/
5) http://educationaltechnology.ca/couros/483?cp=all
Steve Wheeler’s “Learning with E’s”
Ref: “Lurking and Loafing” 3/10/10
I enjoyed the discussion about the differences between “lurking” and “loafing” in
asynchrounous and synchronous discussions. I learned about the theories that explain
why students choose to disengage themselves from participation (fear of criticism in a
large group, waiting to hear what others have to say) and how some students just copy
what others say so it is difficult for tutors or teachers to disseminate who
receives credit for a blog post.  I also learned about the solutions, based
on Harkins and Petty’s research studies, to resolve these problems, e.g. smaller group settings,
increasing the difficulty level of tasks to make it more challenging, differentiate or assign
roles within tasks to hold individuals accountable.  Reading the discussions helped differentiate
what “lurking” and “loafing” meant. This topic really reminded me of my group’s experience in our
690 Research Project where we had students repeating the same things students already said.  Now
that I read this, I can see that the large classroom setting may have contributed to certain
students ‘lurking’ out of fear of criticism or just listening before they respond.
Edublogger
Ref: Teaching Commenting Skills 2/22/10
There’s an interesting discussion about what type of formats should be used when blogging.  It seems
like there was disagreement and later consensus about using a structured format (e.g.”letter” style)
for younger students (e.g 7 yrs old) vs. a more casual format.  The post also included discussions about
proper netiquette.
Teachers Love SmartBoards
Ref: http://www.teacherslovesmartboards.com/
I didn’t find too many discussions on this site, but many posts geared toward elementary and middle
school teachers about possible uses of websites with SMARTBoard tools that can be used in the classroom.
As a high school teacher with a SMARTBoard, I find this sad because my school is investing loads of money
on this technology, but many teachers think PowerPoint is the only thing that can be used on a SMARTBoard.
The problem is that I find it’s not student centered enough unless they are doing the presenting.  Also,
I’m annoyed how there seems to be little in terms of free resources available for high school teachers, e.g.
standards aligned games, etc.
Ref: http://educationaltechnology.ca/couros/483
I-Pods in a Classroom: My Observation 11/30/05
Fascinating discussions between students and adults about why I-Pods with earbuds should be aloud in classroom
settings.  Most students argued that it helped them focus and not become prone to distractions from students, esp
those with ADD or ADHD (i’m not sure how true this is or what studies show).  A lot of controversy about what
students might be listening to and how focused they really might be to what teachers are saying.  As a U.S. History teacher,
I thought I would see more about how I-Pods could be integrated into lessons by teachers such as using music and lyrics to teach history.
If I create an activity revolving around music and lyrics, students will be forced to (and want to in many cases) listen to the
songs I provide them to get historical context for the songs.
I hated how many of the sites had random discussions, fonts that were too bright or just too much
going on in the site.  When I see that a blog is not simple or easy on the eyes, I immediately hit
the “Previous Page” button on my browser.  I won’t be subscribing to many of the blogs just because I have
tons of readings from books that I’ve wanted to read for a very long time. Common Craft might be
the only one I pay attention to because I plan on using the idea for future lessons in US History and
AP Government.  Also, since I just receieved a SMARTBOARD in my classroom this year, I might subscribe to
the Teachers Love SmartBoards blog.  COMET has taken a lot ofpersonal reading time away from me, so I don’t feel like I
have enough time to read both books and blogs.

Tags:

Welcome to My World…

March 7th, 2010 · 28 Comments · Uncategorized

Hi,

My name is Jason Barclay.  I teach U.S. History and AP Government and Politics to 11th and 12th graders, respectively, at Arcadia High School in Arcadia, CA.  So, I mostly teach students in the 16 to 18 year range at times a blessing because of maturity with certain topics, but at other times a nuisance, because of immaturity with other controversial topics.  I tend to not like using blogs not necessarily because of the legal issues associated with it, but rather trying to keep up with the papers and handouts that I normally use, and then checking blog posts.  I guess I just haven’t found an efficient way to track student responses or hold students accountable.  I wanted to start forums for all my classes at the beginning of the year using turnitin.com, but I forgot about keeping up with it and because I wasn’t monitoring it, students just ignored it altogether.  My knowledge of wikis is minimal other than wikipedia. 

Three things about myself…

1.)  I sat next to Danny Devito in a movie theater.

2.)  I was lucky enough to be cast an extra on the set of “Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen.”

3.)  I went to the Mallrats 10th anniversary reunion where I shook hands with/met Kevin Smith, and was clowned on by him.

Tags: